Aboriginal Knowledge Traditions in Digital Environments

Michael Christie

doi:10.1017/S1326011100003975

Authors

Michael Christie School of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100003975

Abstract

According to Manovich (2001), the database and the narrative are natural enemies, each competing for the same territory of human culture. Aboriginal knowledge traditions depend upon narrative through storytelling and other shared performances. The database objectifies and commodifies distillations of such performances and absorbs them into data structures according to a priori assumptions of metadata; that is the data which describes the data to aid a search. In a conventional library for example, the metadata which helps you find a book may be title, author or topic. It is misleading and dangerous to say that these databases contain knowledge, because we lose sight of the embedded, situated, collaborative and performative nature of knowledge. For the assemblages of digital artefacts we find in an archive or database to be useful in the intergenerational transmission of living knowledge traditions, we need to rethink knowledge as performance and data as artefacts of prior knowledge production episodes. Through the metaphors of environment and journey we can explore ways to refigure the archive as a digital environment available as a resource to support the work of active, creative and collaborative knowledge production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allendoerfer C. ( 1962). The narrow mathematician. American Mathematics Monthly, 69, 461– 469.

Bowker G. & Star S. ( 1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Bowker G.C. ( 2000). Biodiversity, datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 30( 5), 643– 683.

Bowker G.C. ( 2005). Memory practices in the sciences. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Christie M. ( 2000). The application of Aboriginal philosophy to school learning. New Horizons in Education, 103, 3– 19.

Christie M. ( 2005). Words, ontologies and Aboriginal databases. Multimedia International Australia, 116, 52– 63.

Cowlishaw G. ( 1992). Studying Aborigines: Changing canons in anthropology and history. In Attwood B. & Arnold J. (Eds.), Power, knowledge and Aborigines(pp. 20– 31. Melbourne: LaTrobe University Press.

Derrida J. ( 1996). Archive fever: A Freudian impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Graham M. ( 1999). Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of Aboriginal worldviews. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 3( 2), 105– 118.

Manovich L. ( 2001). The language of new media. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Marika-Mununggiritj R. ( 1990). Workshops as teaching learning environments. Ngoondjook, 4 43– 54.

Marika-Mununggiritj R., Maymuru B., Mununggurr M., Munyarryun B., Ngurruwutthun G., & Yunupingun Y. ( 1990). The history of the Yirrkala Community School: Yolngu thinking about education in the Laynha and Yirrkala Area. NgoondjookJ, 32– 52.

McConaghy C. ( 2000). Rethinking Indigenous education: Culturalism, colonialism and the politics of knowing. Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.

Muecke S. ( 1992). Lonely representations: Aboriginality and cultural studiesIn Attwood B. & Arnold J. (Eds), Rethinking Indigenous education: Culturalism, colonialism and the politics of knowing. (pp. 32– 44). Melbourne: La Trobe University Press.

Scott G. ( 2004). Audit of Indigenous knowledge databases in Northern Australia. Retrieved 1 December, 2005, from http://www.cdu.edu.au/centres/ik/pdf/IEK_Audit_Report24_06_04.pdf.

Srinivasan R. & Huang J. ( 2004). Fluid ontologies for digital museums. Retrieved 25 February, 2006, from http:/polaris.gseis.ucla.edu.srinivasan/research/Srinivasan HuangJDL2005.pdf.

Verran H. ( 2002). A postcolonial moment in science studies: Alternative firing regimes of environmental scientists and Aboriginal landowners. Social Studies of Science, 32(5 – 6), 729– 762.