Grounded Theory or Grounded Data?: the Production of Power and Knowledge in Ethnographic Research

Authors

  • Neil Harrison School of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100003860

Abstract

Abstract

This paper concerns my own reflections on ethnographic research with Indigenous students studying at university. I began the research by using the methodology of interpretive ethnography to discover what constitutes success for Indigenous students studying at university. But after some unflattering critiques of my initial interpretation of the data, I returned to the drawing board to reflect on the methods that I had used to organise and structure the data in my interpretation. This led me to the critical ethnographers who helped me to look back on my initial positioning to see things that I could not see before. The paper consists of critical reflections on how power and knowledge are produced through the ethnographer’s methodology to suggest that knowledge is not just found in the field or in the data but is also negotiated and produced through the relation between the participant and ethnographer. It is this relation that governs how the data are collected and what the ethnographer can find.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah J., & Stringer E. ( 1997). Indigenous knowledge, Indigenous learning, Indigenous research. Perth: Curtain Indigenous Research Centre.

Bloom L.R. ( 1998). Under the sign of hope: Feminist methodology and narrative interpretation. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Bochner A.P., & Ellis C. ( 1996). Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

Britzman D. ( 1998). Lost subjects, contested objects. Albany: University of New York Press.

Christie M. ( 1994). Grounded and ex-centric knowledges: Exploring Aboriginal alternatives to Western thinking. In Edwards J. (Ed), Thinking: International interdisciplinary perspectives(pp. 24– 34). Highett: Hawker Brownlow.

Clifford J. ( 1986). On ethnographic allegory. In Clifford J. & Marcus G.E. (Eds.), Writing Culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography(pp. 98– 121). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Clifford J. ( 1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Dobbert M.L. ( 1982). Ethnographic research: Theory and application for modern schools and societies. New York: Praeger.

Harrison N. ( 2002). An adventure of insight in ethnography and pedagogy: Learning/teaching relationships and the production of knowledge in the cross-cultural classroom. Unpublished PhD thesis, Northern Territory University, Darwin.

Harding S ( 1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women’s lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Hickling-Hudson A., & Ahlquist R. ( 2003). Contesting the curriculum in the schooling of Indigenous children in Australia and the United States: From eurocentrism to culturally powerful pedagogies. Comparative Education Review, 47( 1), 64– 89.

Keeffe K. ( 1992). From the centre to the city: Aboriginal education, culture and power. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

Lather P. ( 1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.

LeCompte M.D., & Preissle J. ( 1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. London: Academic Press.

Malin M. ( 1989). Invisibility in success, visibility in transgression for the Aboriginal child in the urban classroom: Case studies at home and at school in Adelaide. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Minnesota.

Malin M. ( 2000). An undebated conundrum in the ethics of classroom research: The conflicting rights of researcher, teacher and student within an agenda of reform. Critical Pedagogy Networker: A Publication on Critical Social issues in Education, 13( 1), 1– 10.

McConaghy C. ( 2000). Rethinking Indigenous education: Culturalism, colonialism and the politics of knowing. Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.

Nakata M. ( 1995). Culture in education: A political strategy for us or for them. Ngoonjook: A Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues, 11, 40– 61.

Nakata M. ( 1997). History, cultural diversity & English language teaching. Ngoonjook: A journal of Australian Indigenous Issues, 12, 54– 75.

Rosaldo R. ( 1993). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.

St Pierre E.A., & Pillow W.S. ( 2000). Working the ruins: Feminist poststructuralist theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.

Tierney W.G. ( 2002). Get real: Representing reality. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15( 4), 385– 398.

Tuhiwai Smith L. ( 1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.

Van Maanen J. ( 1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wiersma W. ( 1991). Research methods in education: An introduction(5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Downloads

Published

2003-12-01

How to Cite

Harrison, N. (2003). Grounded Theory or Grounded Data?: the Production of Power and Knowledge in Ethnographic Research. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 32(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100003860

Issue

Section

Articles