Takina te Kawa: Laying theFoundation, a Research Engagement Methodology in Aotearoa (New Zealand)
In the bi-cultural context of Aotearoa (New Zealand), engagement with stakeholders that is transparent and culturally responsive is a priority for educational research. More common research approaches in New Zealand have followed a Western euro-centric model of engagement with research participants resulting in interventions and initiatives that have not necessarily served the needs of the education sector. The authors critically analyse the researcher relationship with research participants to provide a Māori perspective to guide the engagement process as researchers enter educational communities to conduct research. Embedded with Māori ideology and knowledge, the Hei Korowaiethical research framework is a platform for insider positionality that acknowledges partnership between the researcher and the researched for the benefit of knowledge development and the educational sector.
Bishop R. ( 1996). Collaborative research stories: Whakawhanaungatanga. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
Chavez C. ( 2008). Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The Qualitative Report, 13, 474– 494.
Chrisp S. ( 2005). Māori intergenerational language transmission. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 172, 149– 181.
Gergen K. J. ( 2000). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
Hindle R., McRae H., Te Maro P., & Toia R. ( 2008). The “Hei Korowai” ethical framework. Unpublished paper, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.
Macfarlane A., Glynn T., Grace W., Penetito W., & Bateman S. ( 2008). Indigenous epistemology in a national curriculum framework? Ethnicities, 8( 1), 102– 127.
Meyer L. H., Park H. S., Grenot-Scheyer M., Schwartz I., & Harry B. ( 1998). Participatory research: New approaches to the research to practice dilemma. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 165– 177.
Ministry of Education. ( 2005). An evaluation of Te Poutama Tau 2004. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
Penetito W. ( 2001, October). If we only knew … Contextualising Maori knowledge. Paper presented to NZCER Conference, Early Childhood Education for a Democratic Society, Wellington, New Zealand.
Smith G. H. ( 2003, October). Indigenous struggle for the transformation of education and schooling. Keynote Address to the Alaskan Federation of Natives (AFN) Convention, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.
Smith L. T. ( 1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
Smith L. T. ( 2005). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In Denzin N. & Lincoln Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research( 3rded.) (pp. 85– 107). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Walker R., Eketone A., & Gibbs A. ( 2006). An exploration of kaupapa Māori research, its principles, processes and applications. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5( 4), 331– 344.
Wolfgramm R. ( 2008). Creativity and institutional innovation in intercultural research. MAI Review, 3, article 6.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2009 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education is in the process of transitioning to fully Open Access. Most articles are available as Open Access but some are currently Free Access whereby copyright still applies and if you wish to re-use the article permission will need to be sought from the copyright holder. This article's license terms are outlined at the URL above.