Doing Participatory Evaluation: from “Jagged World Views” to Indigenous Methodology

Steven Jordan; Christine Stocek; Rodney Mark; Stacy Matches

doi:10.1375/S1326011100000612

Authors

Steven Jordan McGill University
Christine Stocek McGill University
Rodney Mark McGill University
Stacy Matches McGill University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1375/S1326011100000612

Abstract

The paper will present findings from a Social Science and Humanities Research (SSHRC) funded participatory evaluation conducted over the past four years in the Cree nation of Wemindji in Quebec, Canada. COOL (Challenging Our Own Limits) or “Nigawchiisuun” in Cree, was launched in 2003 as part of a broader program of governance initiatives within Wemindji. As a key component of this new governance program, COOL was to address the need for after-school care within the community for parents, as well as to engage with the recurring problem of low retention rates in school. In consultation with the Band Council of the Cree Nation of Wemindji (James Bay), the Deputy Chief at the time (Rodney Mark) – who was elected Chief in 2006 – established a COOL committee to oversee the design, organisation, implementation and running of the program. Unlike the other eight Cree communities of the James Bay, Wemindji decided to fund and run its own program based on values, customs, and traditions that have been established through consultations with elders, parents, and other interested groups within the community. This has made COOL a distinctly homegrown, autonomous, self-determined Cree program. The paper will not only report on principal themes and issues connected with the establishment and administration of COOL, but will also discuss why a participatory evaluation has been used to assess its effectiveness as a social/educational program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Absolon K., & Willet C. ( 2004). Aboriginal research: Berry picking and hunting in the 21st century. Retrieved 25 February 2009, from http://www.fncfcs.com/pubs/vol1num1/Absolon_Willett_pp5-17.pdf.

Asad T. ( 1986). The concept of translation in British social anthropology. In Clifford J. & Marcus G. E. (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography(pp. 141– 164). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Battiste M. ( 2000). Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision. Toronto, ON: UBC Press.

Boston P., MacNamara E., Kozolanka K., Bobbish-Rondeau E., Iserhoff H., Mianscum S., Mianscum-Trapper R., Mistacheesick I., Petawabano B., Sheshamush-Masty M., Wapachee R., & Weapenicappo J. ( 1997). Using participatory action research to understand meanings aboriginal Canadians attribute to the rising incidence of diabetes. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 18, 5– 12.

Freire P. ( 1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Gramsci A. ( 1974). The prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Cuba E. G., & Lincoln Y. S. ( 1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Jordan S. ( 2003). Who stole my methodology: Co-opting PAR. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1, 185– 200.

Jordan S., Boston P., MacNamara E. M., & Kozolanka K. ( 2000). Some signposts for medical and nursing educational policy formation for aboriginal health care. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 307– 324.

Marcus G. E. ( 1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Mark R. ( 2004, June). Challenging our own limits. Presentation to the Council of Commissioners, Montreal, Canada.

McTaggart R. ( 1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Mianscum H. ( 1999). Mianscum report. Unpublished report to the Cree School Board of James Bay.

Orlick T. ( 1996). Feeling great teaching children to excel at living( 2nded.) Carp, ON: Creative Bound.

Patton M. Q. ( 1997). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context. Evaluation Practice, 18( 2), 147– 163.

Patton M. Q. ( 1999). Organisational development and evaluation. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, Special Issue, 93– 113.

Said E. ( 1993). Culture and imperialism. New York, NY: Knopf.

Schissel B., & Wotherspoon T. ( 2003). The legacy of school for Aboriginal people. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sinclair R. ( 2003). PAR and aboriginal epistemology: A really good fit. Retrieved 22 July, 2003, from http://www.aboriginalsocialwork.ca/special_topics/par/epistemology.htm.

Smith D. E. ( 1990a). Texts, facts, and feminity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge.

Smith D. E. ( 1990b). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

Smith D. E. ( 1994). The relations of ruling: A feminist inquiry. Group for Research into Institutionalisation and Professionalisation of Knowlege-Production (GRIP). Minnesota: University of Minnesota.

Smith L. T. ( 1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research and indigeneous peoples. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.

Smith L. T. ( 2005). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainity. In Denzin N. K. & Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), The Sage Hanbook of Qualitative Research(pp. 85– 108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stocek C., & Mark R. ( 2009). Indigenous research and decolonising methodologies: Possibilities and opportunities. In Langdon J. (Ed.), Indigenous knowledges, development and education(pp. 73– 96). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publications.

Stronach I., & Morris B. ( 1994). Polemical notes on educational evaluation in the age of “policy hysteria”. Evaluation and Research in Education, 8, 5– 19.

Wotherspoon T. ( 2002). The dynamics of social inclusion: Public education and Aboriginal people in Canada. Toronto, ON: Laidlaw Foundation.