Finding Hybrid Solutions to the Financial Management of Customary Land from a Pacific Perspective

Spike Boydell

doi:10.1375/S1326011100000375

Authors

Spike Boydell University of Technology Sydney

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1375/S1326011100000375

Abstract

Within contemporary society, customary land is at the nexus of culture and commercialisation. Tasked with facilitating market-based returns on customary land whilst promoting equitable inter and intra-generational sharing of returns, this paper reports a solutions-based research project that investigated and tested a range of hybrid models in the Pacific context. The challenges are diverse, in many cases confronted by the Western approach, which identifies property and ownership as something to address in a businesslike way. Accepting the notion of ongoing Indigenous guardianship of land as sacrosanct and that de Soto's privatisation model is an unacceptable simplification, this paper offers innovative regional examples of customary land administration/management arrangements in encouraging equitable use of customary land by both members and non-members of land “owning” groups.

Land is the foundation for the lives and cultures of Indigenous peoples the world over. Without access to and rights over their land and natural resources, Indigenous peoples' distinct cultures, and the possibility of determining their own development and future, become eroded (Jensen, 2004, p. 4).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADB. ( 2004). Swimming against the tide: An assessment of the private sector in the Pacific. Manilla: Asian Development Bank.

Appraisal Foundation. ( 2006). Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) Online US appraisal standards. Retrieved 6 February, 2007, from http://commerce.appraisalfoundation.org/html/2006%20USPAP/toc.htm.

AusAID. ( 2006). Pacific 2020: Challenges andopportunitiesfor growth. Canberra, ACT: Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID).

Baum A., & Crosby N. ( 1988). Property investment sppraisal. London: Routledge.

BCBS. ( 2006). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A revised framework, prepared by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). Retrieved 15 June, 2007, from http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs128.pdf.

Behrendt L. ( 2003). Achieving social justice: Indigenous rights and Australia's future. Leichhardt, NSW: Federation Press.

Boydell S. ( 2001). Land tenure and land conflict in the South Pacific. Consultancy report for the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome. Retrieved 12 April, 2007, from http://www.usp.ac.fj/fileadmin/files/faculties/islands/landmgmt/publications/faoreport.pdf.

Boydell S. ( 2001, July). Philosophical perceptions of Pacific property - Fiji, paradise lost or paradise found?Paper presented at the 1st World Congress of the International Real Estate Society, Anchorage, Alaska. Retrieved 12 April, 2007, from http://www.usp.ac.fj/fileadmin/files/faculties/islands/landmgmt/publications/ires2001paradisepaperfinal.pdf.

Boydell S., & Holzknecht H. ( 2003). Land - caught in the conflict between custom and commercialism. Land Use Policy, 20( 5), 203–07.

Boydell S., & Shah K. ( 2003, September). An inquiry into the nature of land ownership in Fiji. Paper presented at The International Association for the Study of Common Property: Second Pacific Regional Meeting, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Retrieved 12 April, 2007, from, http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/archive/00001208/00/Boydell_&_Shahjnquiry_into_land.pdf.

Boydell S. & Small G. ( 2001). The cutting edge 2001: Evolving a Pacific property theory. Oxford, UK: RICS Foundation. Retrieved 12 April, 2007, from http://www.rics.org/NR/rdonlyres/871F1DB1-141F-4E65-8E04-0DAF000C1A06/0/evolvinga_PacificPropertyTheory_20010218.pdf.

Boydell S., Small G., Holzknecht H., & Naidu V. ( 2002, April). Declaration and Resolutions of the FAO/USP/RICS Foundation South Pacific Land Tenure Conflict Symposium, Suva, Fiji. Retrieved 15 June, 2002, from http://www.usp.ac.fj/fileadmin/files/faculties/islands/landmgmt/symposium/DECLRESO.pdf.

Bromley D. ( 1991). Environment and economy: Property rights and public policy. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

de Soto H. ( 2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York, NY: Basic Books.

FAO/USP/RICS Foundation. ( 2002, April). South Pacific Land Tenure Conflict (SPLTC) Symposium Website. Retrieved 15 June, 2002, from http://www.usp.ac.fj/landmgmt/SYMPOSIUM/.

Fingleton J. ( 2004). Is Papua New Guinea viable without customary groups? Pacific Economic Bulletin, 19( 2), 96– 103.

Fingleton J. (Ed.) ( 2005). Privatising land in the Pacific - A defence of customary tenures. Canberra, ACT: The Australia Institute.

Gane D. ( 1995). A DCF analysis of market price for leasehold investments. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 13( 5), 42– 52.

George S. ( 1992). The tail on the kite of commonholds. The Liverpool Law Review, xiv( 1), 83– 91.

Gosarevski S., Hughes H., & Windybank S. ( 2004a). Is Papua New Guinea viable with customary land ownership? Pacific Economic Bulletin, 19( 3), 133–36.

Gosarevski S., Hughes H., & Windybank S. ( 2004b). Is Papua New Guinea viable? Pacific Economic Bulletin, 19( 1), 134–48.

Government of Fiji. ( 2007). Landowners to benefit from revaluation of land. Retrieved 5 July, 2007, from http://www.fiji.gov.fj/publish/page_9373.shtml.

Gray K. J., & Gray S. F. ( 2005). Elements of land law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

IASB. ( 2006). Technical Summary: IAS 40 Investment Property. Retrieved 6 June, 2007, from http://www.iasb.org/NR/rdonlyres/0E7AB953-8BE4-4799-97BC-A3BDEOB01A3E/0/IAS40.pdf.

IVSC. ( 2005). International Valuation Standards 2005, International Valuation Standards Committee. Retrieved 13 June, 2005, from http://ivsc.org/standards/download.html.

Jensen M. W. ( 2004). Editorial - Land rights: A key issue. Indigenous Affairs, 4/04, 4-7. Retrieved 13 December, 2004, from http://www.iwgia.org/graphics/Synkron-Library/Documents/publications/IAEditorials/IA4-04editorial.pdf.

Mackmin D. ( 1995). The negative leasehold. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 13( 5), 53– 57.

Pearsall J. & Hanks P. (Eds.). ( 2003). Oxford dictionary of English( 2nded.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

PIFS. ( 2006). Land management and conflict minimisation project. Suva, Fiji: Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS).

RICS. ( 2006). RICS Appraisal and Valuation Standards( 5thed). Coventry, UK: RICS Business Services Limited. Retrieved 6 February, 2007, from http://www.rics.org/NR/rdonlyres/F870ADB4-1AD9-439C-A776-79AF333C3AC4/0/RICS_appraisal_and_valuation_standards_200611.pdf.

Strakosch E. (2007). Australia. In Stidsen S. (Ed.), The Indigenous world 2007. Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA).

Trott A. ( 1980). Property valuation methods: Interim report(a.k.a. the Trott Report). London: RICS/Polytechnic of South Bank.

Trott A. ( 1986). A summary of the interim report on property valuation methods. In Trott A. (Ed.), Property valuation methods research report(pp. 2– 40). London: RICS/Polytechnic of the South Bank.

World Bank. ( 2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. World Bank policy research report. Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press.