One to One and Face to Face: A Community Based Higher Education Support Strategy Retaining Indigenous Australian University Students

Authors

  • Peta Sharrock University of Western Sydney
  • Helen Lockyer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100016069

Abstract

Abstract

Literature relating to Indigenous Australian students in higher education highlights the need for improving the retention rates of Indigenous students in Australian universities. A cause for concern has been the increasing numbers of Indigenous Australian people experiencing lower progress and completion rates in comparison to non-Indigenous students. The literature suggests that flexible course delivery is a strategy for improving retention rates and participation. This research extends knowledge relating to the effectiveness of providing courses in flexible delivery mode as a retention strategy in Indigenous higher education. It investigates the “reverse block visit” component of a flexi-mode course delivered by the Centre for Aboriginal Studies at Curtin University of Technology in Perth, Western Australia. Initial findings suggest that this community based support strategy may be impacting positively on risk factors contributing to students withdrawing from their studies. Further research is required to explore the validity of this initial data and how the “reverse block visit” from Centre staff may be working to help students to decide to continue studying.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bean J. P., & Metzner B. S. ( 1985). A conceptual model of non-traditional undergraduate student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 18( 2), 199– 231.

Black D. ( 2001). Numbers and more. In Berglund C. (Ed.), Health research(pp. 62– 82) South Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.

Bourke C. J., Burden J., & Moore S. ( 1996). Factors affecting the performance of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students at Australian universities: A case study. Canberra, ACT: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

Centre for the Study of Higher Education (CSHE). ( 2008). Participation and equity: A review of the participation in higher education of people from low socioeconomic backgrounds and Indigenous people. Melbourne, VIC: University of Melbourne.

Department of Education, Science & Training (DEST). ( 2002) Achieving equitable and appropriate outcomes: Indigenous Australians in higher education; Issues Paper Prepared for the Government Review Higher Education at the Cross Roads. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

Department of Education, Employment & Training (DEET). ( 1993) Higher Education Strategies for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Student 1992-1995: A Summary Report. Canberra, ACT: Australian Governmen Publishing Service.

Farrington S., Page B. A., & DiGregorio K. D. ( 2001). The things that matter: Understanding the factors that affect the participation and retention of Indigenous students in the Cadigal program at the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association, October, 40– 55.

Foley D. ( 1996). Perspectives on effective student support for Indigenous students in a tertiary institution. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 24( 2), 53– 55.

Hampton E. ( 1993). Toward a redefinition of American Indian/Alaskan native education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 20( 2), 261– 309.

Indigenous Higher Education Advisory Council (IHEAC). ( 2006). Report to the Minister for Education, Science and Training: Improving Indigenous outcomes and enhancing Indigenous culture and knowledge in Australian higher education. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

Kerr S. ( 2001, September). The role of a remote regional centre in the delivery of the Bachelor Education to Indigenous students. Paper presented at the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia 15th Biennial Forum, Edith Cowan University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Koori Centre & Yooroang Garang. (1996). An Examination of Pedagogical Issues In Indigenous Higher Education & Training Underpinning The Development Of Culturally Appropriate Module Based Programs: A National Priority Reserve Fund Project funded by the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training. Rozelle, NSW: St Clair Press.

Lukabyo J. ( 1995, July). Equity and access in tertiary education: the Indigenous perspective. Paper presented at the Windows of Opportunities in the Nineties: The Indigenous Perspective, the second national conference, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). ( 2001). Exploring multiple pathways for Indigenous students. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

Ramsay E., Tranton D., Sumner R., & Barrett S. ( 1996). Outcomes of a university's Flexible Admissions Policies. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

Sonn C., Bishop B., & Humphries R. ( 1997). Dealing with dominant cultural paradigms: Indigenous students in mainstream higher education(CIRC Discussion Paper No. 7). Bentley, WA: Curtin Indigenous Research Centre.

Walker R. ( 2000). Indigenous performance in Western Australian universities: Reframing retention and success. Unpublished report to the Centre for Aboriginal Studies, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-01

How to Cite

Sharrock, P., & Lockyer, H. (2008). One to One and Face to Face: A Community Based Higher Education Support Strategy Retaining Indigenous Australian University Students. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100016069

Issue

Section

Articles