Education for Hmong Women in Thailand

Xuefang Peng

doi:10.1017/S1326011100004750

Authors

Xuefang Peng Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100004750

Abstract

The Hmong are the second largest tribal group in Thailand. Hmong society is stratified by both age and gender. Women were considered inferior to men in Hmong traditional society. There was a strong bias against education for Hmong women in the past. Hmong women’s access to education has improved with recent developments in the socio-economy and modern educational system. Today there does not appear to be discrimination against girls in continuing their education beyond the compulsory level. However, the conventional ideas that “marrying early, bearing early, and having many children are blessings” are popular in the Hmong community. Many girls of school age leave school for marriage. These traditional conventions are an obstacle for females in continuing their formal education. Today, the Hmong’s traditional subsistence economy is undergoing change, and many Hmong women are actively involved in business. Adult and vocational education is also an important way for Hmong women to improve their educational level and gain new skills for making a living. This paper is based on anthropological field research carried out in northern Thailand from December 2003 to September 2004, supported by the Asian Scholarship Foundation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cooper R., Tapp N., Yia Lee G., & Schwoer-Kohl G. ( 1996). The Hmong. Bangkok: Artasia Press.

Donnelly N.D. ( 1994). Changing lives of refugee Hmong women. Seattle, DC: University of Washington Press.

Hengsuwan P. ( 2003, July). Contradictions on the struggles over resources and contesting terrain of ethnic groups on the hill in protected area, Chom Thong, Chiang Mai. Paper presented at the International Conference “ Politics of the Commons: Articulating Development and Strengthening Local Practices” organized by the Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development (RCSD), Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Kamnuansilpa P., Kunstadter P., & Auamkul N. ( 1987. Hill tribe health and family panning: Results of a survey of Hmong (Meo) and Karen households in Northern Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: Family Health Division, Department of Health.

Leepreecha P. ( 2001). Kinship and identity among Hmong in Thailand. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.

Peplau L.A., Veniegas R.C., Taylor P.L., & Debro S.C. ( 1999). Sociocultural perspectives on the lives of women and men. In Peplau L.A. Champan S. DeBro S.C. Veniegas R.C. Rosemary C. & Taylor P.L. (Eds.), Gender, culture, and ethnicity(pp. 23– 37). London: Mayfield.

Peplau L.A., Wade C., & Tavris C. ( 1999). Gender and culture. In Peplau L.A. Champan DeBro S. Veniegas R.C. & Taylor P.L. (Eds.), Gender, culture, and ethnicity(pp. 15– 22). London: Mayfield.

Symonds P.V. ( 1991). Cosmology and the cycle of life: Hmong views of birth, death and gender in a mountain village in Northern Thailand. Unpublished PhD thesis, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Tapp N. ( 1985). Categories of change and continuity among the White Hmong of Northern Thailand. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, London.

Tribal Research Institute. ( 2002). Tribal population summary in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: University of Chiang Mai.