Indigenous Autoethnography: Formulating Our Knowledge, Our Way

Jennifer Houston

doi:10.1017/S1326011100004695

Authors

Jennifer Houston University Department of Rural Health

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100004695

Abstract

This paper seeks to engage the cultural interface where Indigenous knowledge meets western academia, by questioning the validity of traditional research methods. Firstly, it is a response to the challenges facing Indigenous people confronted with the ethical and methodological issues arising from academic research. Secondly, it is a journey into academia, where the researcher is all too often forced to remove the “self” from the “subject”; a difficult task for an Aboriginal person involved in research concerning Aboriginal people. Distancing oneself from research is even more difficult if the research is based closer to home, in one's own community.

Therefore, a significant need exists for Indigenous people to conduct and present research in a manner respectful of Indigenous ways of understanding and reflective of the ways in which Indigenous peoples wish to be framed and understood. This need has fuelled the search for Indigenous methodologies, which challenge the imperial basis of Western knowledge and the images of the Indigenous “Other”. The search for appropriate methodologies is part of the process Linda Smith (1999) calls “decolonisation” .

The Indigenous researcher - burdened with the challenge to perform academically rigorous research and the desire to practice this research respectfully - is often overwhelmed with internal conflict. Indigenous autoethnography represents one methodological option to such researchers. Indigenous autoethnography seeks to establish itself as a legitimate and respectful means of acquiring and formulating knowledge, by combining the tradition of storytelling, with the practice of academic research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bin-Sallik M. (Ed.) ( 2000). Aboriginal women by degrees: Their stories of a journey towards academic achievement. St Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland Press.

Bruner J. ( 1993). The autobiographical process. In Folkenflik R. (Ed.), The culture of autobiography: Constructions of self-representation(pp. 38– 56). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Charmaz K., & Mitchell R. ( 1997). The myth of silent authorship: Self, substance, and style in ethnographic writing. In Hertz R. (Ed.), Reflexivity and voice(pp. 193– 215). London: Sage.

Curthoys A. ( 1988). For and against feminism: A personal journey into feminist theory and history. Sydney NSW: Allen and Unwin.

Deck A. ( 1990). Autoethnography: Zora Neale Hurston, Noni Jabavu, and cross-disciplinary discourse. Black American Literature Forum, 24( 2), 237– 256.

Denzin N.K. ( 1989). Interpretive biography. London: Sage.

Denzin N.K. ( 1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. London: Sage.

Denzin N.K. & Lincoln Y.S. ( 1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London: Sage.

Denzin N.K. & Lincoln Y.S. ( 2003). Strategies of qualitative research(2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Du Bois W.E.B. ( 1903). The souls of Black folk Cambridge, MA: University Press John Wilson and Son.

Ellis C. ( 1995). Final negotiations: A story of love, loss, and chronic illness Philadelphia, PA: Tmple University Press.

Ellis C. ( 1997). Evocative ethnography: Writing emotionally about our lives. In Tierney W.G. & Lincoln Y.S. (Eds.), Representation and the text: Reframing the narrative voice(pp. 115– 142). Albany NY: State University of New York Press.

Ellis C. & Bochner A.P. ( 2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In Denzin N.K. & Lincoln Y.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research(2nd ed., pp. 733– 768). London: Sage.

Fischer M.N. ( 1986). Ethnicity and the post-modern arts of memoryIn Clifford J. & Marcus G.E. (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography(pp. 194– 233). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Gatson S. ( 2003). On being amorphous: Autoethnography, genealogy and a multiracial identity. Qualitative Inquiry, 9( 1), 20– 48. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Gubrium J.A., & Holstein J.A. ( 1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Hartman A. ( 1992). In search of subjugated knowledge. Social Work, 37, 483– 484.

hooks b. ( 1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.

Huffer E., & Qalo R. ( 2004). Have we been thinking upside-down? The contemporary emergence of Pacific theoretical thought. The Contemporary Pacific, 16( 1), 87– 116.

Jebb M.A., & Haebich A. ( 1992). Across the great divide: Gender relations on Australian frontiers. In Saunders K. & Evans R. (Eds.), Gender relations in Australia: Domination and negotiation(pp. 20– 41). Sydney, NSW: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Jennings K., & Hollingsworth D. ( 1988). Ways of seeing and talking about Aboriginal women: Shy maids and wanton strumpets. Hecate, 13( 2), 129– 133.

Langford R. ( 1988). Don't take your love to town. Ringwood, VIC: Penguin Books.

Meyer M.A. ( 2001). Our own liberation; reflections on Hawaiin epistemology. The Contemporary Pacific, 13( 1), 125.

Meyer M.A. ( 2005). Remembering our future: Higher education quality assurance and Indigenous epistemology. World Indigenous Nations Higher Education Consortium (WINHEC) Journal, 3, n.p.

Moreton-Robinson A. ( 2000). Talkin’ up to the white woman: Aboriginal women and feminism. Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland Press.

Olson L.N. ( 2004). The role of voice in the (re)construction of a battered woman’s identity: An autoethnography of one woman's experiences of abuse. Women's Studies in Communication, 27( 1), 1– 33.

Pratt M.L. ( 1986). Fieldwork in common places. In Clifford J. & Marcus G.E. (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography(pp. 27– 50). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Pratt M.L. ( 1994). Transculturation and autoethnography: Peru 1615/1980. In Clifford J. & Barker F. Iverson M. (Eds.), Colonial discourse/postcolonial theory(pp. 24– 46). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Reed-Danahay D.E. ( 1997). Introduction. In. Reed-Danahay D.E. (Ed.), Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the social and the self(pp. 1– 17). New York NY: Berg.

Russel T. ( 1998). Autoethnography: Journeys of the self. Retrieved 1 October, 2005, from http://www.haussite.net.

Settelmaier E. & Taylor P. (2002, July). Using autobiography to map an interpretive researcher’s sensitivities toward her subject(s). Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Science Educaion Research Association, Townsville, Queensland.

Smith L. ( 1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.

Spry T. ( 2001). Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7( 6), 706– 730.

Staler A. ( 1999). Race and the education of desire: Foucault's history of sexuality and the colonial order of things. Durham, NC. University Press.

Subramani ( 2001). The oceanic imaginary. The Contemporary Pacific, 13( 1), 149– 162.