the Tree of Life as a Research Methodology

Authors

  • Vivian M. Jiménez Estrada Ontario Institute for Studies in Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100003951

Abstract

Abstract

This paper is grounded on the premise that research, as a colonising practice, needs constant reconceptualisation and rethinking. I propose a methodology based on some of the values, visions and stories from my own Maya Indigenous culture and knowledge in addition to other Indigenous cultures across the world. I argue that researchers need to constantly acknowledge and change the negative impacts of ignoring multiple ways of knowing by engaging in respectful methods of knowledge collection and production. This paper contributes to the work Indigenous scholars have done in the area of research methodologies and knowledge production. First, a general overview of the values and concepts embedded in the Ceibaor the “Tree of Life” is presented; then, a discussion of what respectful research practices entail follows; finally, it concludes with a reflection on how the Ceibais a small example of how researchers can adapt their research methodology to the local context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson K., ( 2000). Recognition of being: Reconstructing native womanhood. Toronto: SecondStory Press.

Baber Z., ( 1996). The Science of empire: Scientific knowledge, civilisation, and colonial rule in India. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Battiste M. (Ed.) ( 2002). Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision. Vancouver: University ofBritish Columbia Press.

Bishop R. ( 1998). Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research: A Maori approach to creating knowledge. International Journal of Qualitative Education, 11( 2), 199– 219.

Cajete G. ( 1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of Indigenous education. Durango, CO: Kivaki Press.

Consejo Nacional de EducatiÓn Maya. (CNEM). ( 2004). Uxe’al Ub’antajik leMayab’ Tijonik: Marco FilosÓfico de la EducaciÓn Maya. Guatemala: Save the Children.

Cordero C. . ( 1995). A working and evolving definition of culture Journal of Native Education, 21, 1– 13.

Dei G.J.S., Hall B., & Rosenberg D. ( 2000). Indigenous knowledges: An introductionIn Dei S., Hall B. & Rosenberg D. (Eds.), Indigenous knowledges in global contexts: Multiple readings ofour world, (pp. 3– 12. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

Ermine W. ( 1995). Aboriginal epistemology. In Battiste M. & Barman J. (Eds.), First Nation education in Canada: Thecircle unfolds, (pp. 101– 112. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Graveline F.J. ( 1998). Circle works. Circle works: Fernwood.

Hermes M. ( 1998). Research methods as a situated response: Towards a First Nations’ methodology. QualitativeStudies in Education. 11( 1), 155– 168.

Jimènez V. ( 2002). Deconstructing resistance: Indigenous knowledge, culture and the Zapatista struggle for Indigenous autonomy.Unpublished Master–s thesis, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Menzies C.R. ( 2001). Reflections on research with, for, and among Indigenous peoples. Canadian Journal of NativeEducation, 25( 1), 19– 36.

Montejo V. ( 2005). Maya intellectual renaissance, Austin: University of Texas Press.

Mosquera Saravia M.T. ; Gaspar Salvador M.A. & Sucuquí Mejía I. ( 2002). Reflections on research with, for, and among Indigenous peoples. Conociendo la sabiduríaAchí: Saludy Enfermedad en Rabinal. Guatemala: Institute de Estudios Interetnicos de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala.

Recinos A. (Ed.). ( 1987). Fopol Vuh(20th ed.). Guatemala City: EDUCA.

Ren A. ; ( 2001). Maya archaeology and the political and cultural identity of contemporary Maya in Guatemala. Retrieved 16 November, 2004, from http://ethical.arts.ubc.ca/Avexnim.html.

Shahjahan R.A. (forthcoming). Mapping the field of anti-colonial discourse to understand issues of Indigenous knowledge: Decolonising praxis. McGill Journal of Education.

Smith L. ( 1999) Decolonising methodologies: Researchand Indigenous people. London: Zed Books.

Taurima W., & Cash J. ( 2000, December). Te Wananga: Developing a bicultural modelusing critical systems. Paper presented at the 35th annual conference of the Operational Research Society of New Zealand, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved 22 April, 2005, from http://www.esc.auckland.ac.nz/Organisations/ORSNZ/conf35/papers/TaurimaCash.pdf.

Tedlock D. ( 1993). Breath on the mirror: Mythic voices and visions of the living Maya. San Franciso: Harper.

wa‘ Thiong’o N. ( 1996). Decolonising the mind. London: Heinemann.

Warren K. ( 1998). Indigenous movements and their critics: Pan-Maya activism in Guatemala. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Weber-Pillwax C. ( 1999). Indigenous research methodology: Exploratory discussion of an elusive subject. Journal of Educational Thought, 33( 1), 31– 45.

Wilson S. ( 2003). Progressing toward an Indigenous research paradigm. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 27( 2), 161– 178.

Downloads

Published

2005-12-01

How to Cite

Estrada, V. M. J. (2005). the Tree of Life as a Research Methodology. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 34(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1326011100003951

Issue

Section

Articles