Doing Decoloniality in the Writing Borderlands of the PhD

Ailie McDowall; Fabiane Ramos

doi:10.1017/jie.2017.23

Authors

Ailie McDowall The University of Queensland
Fabiane Ramos The University of Queensland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2017.23

Keywords:

decoloniality, writing, feminism, Borderlands, doctoral research

Abstract

This paper takes us into the Writing Borderlands, an ambiguous in-between space borrowed from Anzaldúa's concept of Borderlands, where we as PhD students are in a constant state of transition. We argue that theorising from a decolonial position consists of not merely using concepts around coloniality/decoloniality, but also putting its core ideas into practice in the ‘doing’ aspect of research. The writing is a major part of this doing. We enact epistemic disobedience by challenging taken-for-granted conventions of what ‘proper’ academic writing looks like. Writing from a universal standpoint — the type of writing prescribed in theses formats, positivist research methods and ‘proper’ academic writing — has been instrumental in promoting the zero-point epistemologies that prevail through Northern artefacts of knowledge. In other words, we write to de-link from the epistemological assumption of a neutral and detached observational location from which the world is interpreted. In this paper, we discuss the journey we take as PhD students as we attempt to delink and decolonise our writing. Traversing the landscape of the Writing Borderlands, different features arise and fall. Along the way, we come across forks in the road between academic training and the new way we imagine writing decolonially.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams St PierreE. (2014). A brief and personal history of post qualitative research: Toward “post inquiry”. Journal of Curriculum and Theorizing, 30(2), 2–19.

AnzaldúaG. (1987). La frontera/borderlands: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.

AnzaldúaG. (1990). Making face, making soul/haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.

AnzaldúaG. (2002). (Un)natural bridges, (Un)safe spaces. In G. E. Anzaldúa & A. L. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 1–5). New York, NY: Routledge.

AnzaldúaG. (2009a). En rapport, in opposition: Cobrando cuentas a las nuestras. In A. L. Keating (Ed.), The Gloria Anzaldúa reader (pp. 111–118). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

AnzaldúaG. (2009b). On the process of writing borderlands/la frontera. In A. L. Keating (Ed.), The Gloria Anzaldúa reader (pp. 187–197). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

AnzaldúaG. (2015). Light in the dark/Luz en lo oscuro. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

BrayboyB.M.J. (2005). Towards a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446. doi: 10.1007/s11256-005-008-y

ChristianB. (1988). The race for theory. Feminist Studies, 14(1), 67–79.

CixousH. (1976). The laugh of the medusa (K. Cohen & P. Cohen, Trans.). Signs, 1(4), 875–893.

CixousH. (1991). Coming to writing and other essays (D. Jensen, Ed., & S. Cornell, D. Jensen, A. Liddle & S. Sellers, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

ConnellR. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social sciences. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

GrosfoguelR. (2008). Transmodernity, border thinking, and global coloniality. Decolonizing Political Economy and Postcolnial Studies. Retrieved from www.humandee.org

HarawayD. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). London, UK: Routledge

hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress. London, UK: Routledge.

hooksb. (1997). Wounds of passion: A writing life. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.

KamlerB., & ThomsonP. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. New York, NY: Routledge.

KovachM. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

LevineD.N. (1985). The flight from ambiguity: Essays in social and cultural theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

LugonesM. (2003). Pilgrimages/peregrinajes: Theorizing coalition against multiple oppressions. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.

MackinlayE. (2015). In danger of writing: Performing the poetics and politics of autoenthnography with Hélène Cixous and Virginia Woolf. Qualititative Research Jounal, 15(2), 189–201. doi: 10.1108/QRJ-01-2015-0010

MackinlayE., & BartleetB.-L. (2012). Friendship as research: Exploring the potential of sisterhood and personal relationships as the foundations of musicological and ethnographic fieldwork. Qualitative Research Journal, 12(1), 75–87. doi: 10.1108/14439881211222741.

Maldonado-TorresN. (2007). On the coloniality of being. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 240–270. doi: 10.1080/09502380601162548

Maldonado-TorresN. (2011). Thinking through the decolonial turn: post-continental interventions in theory, philosophy and critique - an introduction. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2), 1–15.

MignoloW. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. doi: 10.1177/0263276409349275

MignoloW. (2011). Decolonizing western epistemology: Building decolonial epistemologies. In A. M. Isasi-Diaz (Ed.), Decolonizing epistemologies: Latina/o theology and philosophy (pp. 19–43). New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

MohantyC. T. (2003). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In R. Lewis & S. Mills (Eds.), Feminist postcolonial theory: A reader (pp. 49–74). New York: Routledge.

NakataM. (2010). The cultural interface of islander and scientific knowledge. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 39s, 53–57.

NakataN.M., NakataV., KeechS., & BoltR. (2012). Decolonial goals and pedagogies for Indigenous studies. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 120–140.

QuijanoA. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178. doi: 10.1080/09502380601164353

RichardsonL. (1990). Narrative and sociology. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19(1), 116–135. doi: 10.1177/089124190019001006

RichardsonL. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

RichardsonL. (2001). Poetic representation of interviews. In J.F. Gubrium & J.A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 876–892). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

RichardsonL., & St PierreE.A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed. pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

SaavedraC.M., & NymarkE.D. (2008). Borderland-mestisaje feminism: The new tribalism. In N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 255–276). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

SiumA., & RitskesE. (2013). Speaking truth to power: Indigenous storytelling as an act of living resistance. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), i–x.

SmithL.T. (2009). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.

Tillmann-HealyL.M. (2003). Friendship as method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(5), 729–749. doi: 10.1177/1077800403254894

TlostanovaM.V., & MignoloW.D. (2012). Learning to unlearn: Decolonial reflections from Eurasia and the Americas. Colombus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

TrinhM.-H. (1989). Women, native, other: Writing, postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

TuckE., & YangK.W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.