Indigenous Learning Preferences and Interactive Technologies

Authors

  • Andrew Kitchenham University of Northern British Columbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2016.12

Keywords:

Indigenous learning preferences, interactive technologies, pedagogy, Aboriginal learning

Abstract

This three-year research study examined the influence of interactive technologies on the math achievement of Indigenous students in Years 4, 5, 6 and 7 technology — equipped classrooms in a rural elementary school in British Columbia, Canada. Using a mixed-methods approach, the researcher conducted semistructured interviews and collected math achievement data (reported elsewhere) over a three-year span, and distributed a survey to the teachers in the second year of the study. All data sources revealed that interactive technologies such as SMARTBoards, student response systems and document cameras influence positively Indigenous students’ math achievement over a three-year period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alberta Education, Aboriginal Services Branch. (2005). Our words, our ways: Teaching first nations, metis, and inuit learners. Edmonton, AB: Author.

Cooper T.J., Warren E., & Doig S.M. (2004). Young “white” teachers’ perceptions of mathematics learning of aboriginal and non-aboriginal students in remote communities. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 2, (pp. 71–246).

El Sayed F., Soar J., & Wang Z. (2012). Key factors for the development of a culturally appropriate interactive multimedia informative program for Aboriginal health workers. The Australian Journal of Indigneous Education, 41, 162–172. doi: 10.1017/jie.2012.19.

First Nations Education Steering Committee (FNESC). (2015). First Peoples’ principles of learning. Retrieved July 17, 2015 from http://www.fnesc.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/PUB-LFP-POSTER-Principles-of-Learning-First-Peoples-poster-11x17.pdf.

Green N. (1982). The classroom teacher's influence on the performance of Aboriginal children. In J. Sherwood (Ed.), Aboriginal education: Issues and innovations (pp. 107–126). Perth, Australia: Creative Research.

Hughes P., & More A. (1997). Aboriginal ways of learning and learning styles. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. AARE: Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from www.aare.edu.au/97pap/hughp518.htm.

Kitchenham A.D. (2009). Mixed method research. In A. Mills , G. Durepos & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 561–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kitchenham A.D. (2013). The preservation of Indigenous language and culture through educational technology. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 19 (4), 351–364.

Maher M. (2012). Teacher education with indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing as a key pillar. AlterNative, 8 (3), 343–356.

More A. (1987). Native Indian learning styles: A review for researchers and teachers. Journal of American Indian Education, 27 (1), 17–29.

Rasmussen C., Baydala L., & Sherman J. (2004). Learning patterns and education of Aboriginal children: A review of the literature. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 24, 317–342.

Saldaña J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schreier M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Swisher K. (1994). American Indian learning styles survey: An assessment of teachers’ knowledge. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 59–77.

Teddlie C., & Tashakkori A. (Eds.) (2003). Handbook of mixed-methods in social and behavioral sciences research (pp. 3–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Toulouse P.R. (2008). Integrating aboriginal teaching and values into the classroom. What Works? Research into Practice, 11, 1–4.

Truth and Reconciliation Committee of Canada (TRCC). (2015a). Truth and reconciliation committee of Canada: Calls to action. Winnipeg, MB: Author.

Truth and Reconciliation Committee of Canada (TRCC). (2015b). Honouring the truth, reconciling the future: Summary of the final report of the truth and reconciliation committee of Canada. Winnipeg, MB: Author.

Vancouver IslandNet. (2008). Vancouver Island net diagnostic math assessment. Retrieved July 17, 2015 from http://web.sd71.bc.ca/islandnet/index.php?page=dma.

van Manen M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, ON: Althouse Press.

van Manen M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. London, ON: Althouse Press.

van Manen M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

White F. (2008). Ancestral language acquisition among Native Americans: A study of the Haida language class. New York, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.

White F. (2014). Emerging from out of the margins: Essays on Haida language, culture, and history. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-10

How to Cite

Kitchenham, A. (2016). Indigenous Learning Preferences and Interactive Technologies. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 46(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2016.12

Issue

Section

Articles