The Importance of Culturally Safe Assessment Tools for Inuit Students

Authors

  • Jasmin Stoffer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2016.30

Keywords:

education, inuit, cultural safety, assessment

Abstract

There are still no major assessment and diagnostic tools that educators can use to properly assess our Inuit students’ learning. Cultural safety as it is currently defined in New Zealand educational research (Macfarlane et al., 2007) is necessary in creating a classroom community that encourages the appreciation of culture and worldview, and ultimately enables success as defined by the culture and community of the students. Modern day assessment tools used with Inuit students must also conform to this standard of cultural safety in order to ensure the equity and authenticity of the assessment results. There is a need for ongoing research and development of culturally safe assessment tools. To date, recommendations that include collaboration with local populations, evaluation of the tools presently being used, and the due diligence of ensuring these tools are culturally unbiased are a few guidelines that have the potential of creating culturally safe assessments that portray students’ true learning abilities and assist both teacher and community in the support of their students’ learning and success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ball J. (2007). Aboriginal young children's language and literacy development: Research evaluating progress, promising practices, and needs. Retrieved January 18, 2016, from http://www.afn.ca/uploads/files/education2/aboriginal_young_childrens_languag_&_literacy_development,_j._ball,_2007.pdf.

Brascoupé S., & Waters C. (2009). Cultural Safety: Exploring the applicability of the concept of cultural safety to aboriginal health and community wellness. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 5 (2), 6–41.

Government of Nunavut (2008) Foundation for Dynamic Assessment Ilitaunnikulirniq: As Learning in Nunavut Schools. Retrieved January 11, 2016, from http://www.gov.nu.ca/sites/default/files/files/IlitaunnikuliriniqDynamicAssessment.pdf.

Macfarlane A., Glynn T., Cavanagh T., & Bateman S. (2007). Creating culturally-safe schools for Maori students. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36, 65–76.

Mueller C. (2006). Creating a joint partnership: Including qallunat teacher voices within Nunavik education policy. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10 (4–5), 429–447.

Mushquash C.J., & Bova D. (2007). Cross-cultural assessment and measurement issues. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 13 (1), 53–66.

National Committee on Inuit Education (2011). First Canadians, Canadians First: National Strategy on Inuit Education, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami.

Pearson Clinical (2016). Qualifications policy, clinical psychology. Retrieved May 1, 2016 from http://www.pearsonclinical.com/psychology/qualifications.html.

Pearson Clinical (2016). The peabody picture vocabulary test (Fourth ed.) Retrieved March 4, 2016 from https://www.pearsonclinical.com.au/products/view/242#tabs=2.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015). The Final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future. Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Williams R. (1999). Cultural safety – what does it mean for our practice? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 23 (2), 213–214.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-24

How to Cite

Stoffer, J. (2017). The Importance of Culturally Safe Assessment Tools for Inuit Students. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 46(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2016.30

Issue

Section

Articles