Teaching Beginning Teachers to ‘Think What We Are Doing’ in Indigenous Education

Barbara Kameniar; Sally Windsor; Sue Sifa

doi:10.1017/jie.2014.27

Authors

Barbara Kameniar The Melbourne Institute for Indigenous Development
Sally Windsor The Melbourne Institute for Indigenous Development
Sue Sifa The Melbourne Institute for Indigenous Development

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2014.27

Keywords:

Indigenous education, beginner teachers, The Hunger Games, Hannah Arendt

Abstract

Working with beginning teachers to assist them to begin to ‘think what we do’ (Arendt, 1998) in both mainstream and Indigenous education is problematic. This is particularly so because the majority of our teacher candidates, and indeed most of their university lecturers, are positioned close to the racial, social and cultural centre of Australian education. That is, teachers and teacher educators tend to be white, middle class, educationally successful, and accepting of the main premises and assumptions, purposes and values of formal schooling in Australia. This proximity to the centre can lead to an inability to question ideas and practices that, while everyday and seemingly innocuous, are frequently dangerous and destructive for those at the margins. In this article, we illustrate the normative power of hegemonic ideas by using aspects of the teen fiction The Hunger Games as an analogy for ‘thoughtless’ and unquestioning acceptance of authority. We then describe and discuss a pedagogic practice used within the Master of Teaching program at the Melbourne Graduate School of Education. The practice is designed to challenge normative understandings about Australian history, teaching Indigenous Australian students, and to encourage engagement with the German-American Jewish philosopher and political theorist Hannah Arendt's provocative question ‘What are we doing?’ (Arendt, 1998, p. 5). We conclude the article with a challenge to re-think current policies and practices in the education of Indigenous Australians.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ArendtH. (1971). Thinking and moral considerations: A lecture. Social Research, 38(3), 417–446.

ArendtH. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

ArendtH. (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: Penguin Books.

BatesT.R. (1975). Gramsci and the theory of hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(2), 351–366.

BiermannS., & Townsend-CrossM. (2008). Indigenous pedagogy as a force for change. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37(Suppl.), 146–154.

BrodkinK. (1999). Studying whiteness: What's the point and where do we go from here? In B.McKay (Ed.), Unmasking whitenessBrisbane, Australia: Griffith University.

ButlerJ. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.

ButlerJ. (2011). Hannah Arendt's death sentences. Comparative Literature Studies, 48(3), 280–295.

CelermajerD.(Writer) & ABC (Director). (2012). The inconsistency of Hannah Arendt [Radio], The Philosopher's Zone. ABC Radio.

DeweyJ. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.

EganT., & IngpenR. (1997). The drover's boy. Melbourne, Australia: Lothian.

FogartyW., & SchwabR.G. (2012). Indigenous education: Experiential learning and learning through country. Working Paper No 81 CAEPR Working Papers. Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), Australian National University.

FrankenburgR. (1993). White women race matters: The social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.

FranklV.E. (2011). Man's search for meaning, London: Random House.

GriffithsA. (2011). The component of best-practice Indigenous education: A comparative review. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 40, 69–80.

HewittJ., & HallP.M. (1973). Social problems, problematic situations and quasi-theories. American Sociological Review, 38, 367–374.

KeatingP. (Producer). (1992). Keating speech: The Redfern address. Spoken Word. Retrieved from http://aso.gov.au/titles/spoken-word/keating-speech-redfern-address/extras/

KozulinA., GindisB., AgeyevV., & MillerS. (Eds.). (2003). Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.

MarchantB., EganT., & EvansN. (1995). The drover's boy: Series of paintings. Bundeena, Australia: Marchant.

McCollowJ. (2012). A controversial reform in Indigenous education: The Cape York Aboriginal Australian Academy. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41, 97–109. doi:10.1017/jie.2012.22.

OsborneS. (2013). Learning versus education: Rethinking learning in Anangu schools. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 42(2), 171–181.

PiagetJ. (1985). Equilibration of cognitive structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

RazackS. (2001). Looking white people in the eye: Gender, race and culture in courtrooms and classrooms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

SarraC. (2011, October). Keynote address: Time for a high expectations relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australia. Paper presented at the Strong Start Bright Futures Conference, Darwin, Australia.

ShorI., & FreireP. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

YatesL. (1992). Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics; or, if master narratives have been discredited what does Giroux think he is doing?Discourse, 13(1), 124–133.