Prevalent Attitudes and School Policy toward Non-standard Dialects

Authors

  • E.M. Fisher

Abstract

We, as teachers, usually find it difficult to accept the oral language patterns that some of our pupils bring to school. “We are prone to inject an element of morality into our pseudo-standard of English.” (Cheney 1976, p.58).

As Hall (1959) so ably comments, “Our native speech is inextricably bound to our perception of friends, community, religion, nation and other peoples.”

Basically, non-standard dialects are viewed either as a deficit form of standard English or a different but equal language system. These are basically the two main models. Wolfram (1973, p.68) says that, in the deficit model, speech differences are viewed and described with reference to a norm and deviation from that norm. The control group norm is, of course, middle-class speech or standard English. Nonconformity to this norm is seen as an indication of retarded language acquisition or under-developed language. Nonstandard dialects are considered as the pathology of non-organic speech deficiencies, and the patterns of these dialects are labelled with such terms as ‘misarticuiations’; ‘deviations’; ‘replacements’; ‘faulty pronunciations’ and the like.

The ‘difference’ model sees non-standard dialects as self-contained systems in their own rights. They have their own phonological and grammatical rules and are equally legitimate both socially and psychologically, as well as being syntactically functionally equivalent to standard English.

References

Bereiter C. & Engelman S. : Teaching Disadvantaged Children in the Preschool. Prentice Hall , N.J. 1966.

Bernstein B. : Language and Social Class, British Journal of Sociology. 11, 1960.

Bernstein B. : Social structure language and learning. Educational Research . 3, 1960.

Burling R. : English in Blaok and White. Holt/Rinehart and Winston, N.Y., 1973 .

Cheyney A.B. : Teaching the Culturally Disadvantaged in the Elementary School. C.E. Merrill, Ohio, 1976 .

Dale P.S. : Language Development Structure and Function. Uni. Washington, Dryden Press, Illinois, 1972.

Hall E.T. : The Silent Language. Premier Bk. Fawcett World Library , N.Y., 1959.

Johnson K.R. : Teachers’ Attitudes towards the Non-standard Negro Dialect – ‘Let’s Change it’. Elementary English No. 48, Feb. 1971. (a)

Johnson K.R. : Should Black Children Learn Standard English. Viewpoints, Vol.47 , 2, Mar. 1971.

Gumperz J. : The Speech Community. International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. Macmillan, London, 1968.

Hymes D. (Ed.): Language in Culture and Society. Harper/Row Pub . N.Y., 1964.

Kohl H. : Fifty-Six Children. New America Lib. 1968. Penguin, London, 1971 .

Labov W. : The Language of Non-standard English, 1969. In Giglioli P.P. (Ed.) Language and Social Context. Penguin, London, 1972.

Wolfram W. : The Nature of Non-standard Divergence. In Savage J.F., Linguistics for Teachers. S.R.A. 1973 .

Downloads

Published

1977-08-01

How to Cite

Fisher, E. (1977). Prevalent Attitudes and School Policy toward Non-standard Dialects. The Aboriginal Child at School, 5(4), 17–20. Retrieved from https://ajie.atsis.uq.edu.au/acs/article/view/1355

Issue

Section

Across Australia …… From Teacher To Teacher